FCC Fact Sheet and draft: Call Branding FNPRM, Improving Verification and Presentation of Caller Identification Information (FCC-CIRC2510-07)

Publisher

Federal Communications Commission

URL

https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-415059A1.txt

Published

2025-10-07

Updated

unknown

Accessed

2026-09-24

HTTP status

206

License

US government work, public domain; public domain; short excerpts and locators still used

Source notes citing this source

• The FCC call-branding draft says ATIS-1000094 v002 was finalized in July 2025. disputed in context
• The draft FNPRM says legacy CNAM databases remain the only widespread source of caller name information but are reportedly not reliably accurate and are open to manipulation. in context
• On 7 October 2025 the FCC released a fact sheet and public draft (FCC-CIRC2510-07) of a Call Branding FNPRM titled Improving Verification and Presentation of Caller Identification Information, in CG Dockets 17-59, 02-278 and 25-307 and WC Docket 17-97. in context
• The draft FNPRM proposes a verified name, personal or business, as the minimum caller identity to present, with logo and call reason beyond that minimum. in context
• The draft FNPRM proposes that terminating providers must send verified caller identity information to the handset whenever they send an indication that the call received A-level attestation. in context
• The draft FNPRM sets no concrete compliance deadline for RCD caller-name presentation; it asks how quickly providers could implement RCD and whether smaller or rural providers should be exempt. in context
• The draft FNPRM notes that RCD works only on IP networks and asks what to do about the non-IP gap, including whether to require other solutions that work on non-IP networks. in context
• The draft FNPRM proposes that originating providers employ reasonable measures to verify the accuracy of the caller identity information they transmit, and asks what counts as reasonable. in context
• The draft FNPRM describes RCD as building on STIR/SHAKEN to carry name, photo, logo, email, location, title and call reason, and cites RFC 9795, RFC 9796 and ATIS-1000094 v002 as the RCD standards. in context
• The evidence in this packet does not show that any US rule requiring RCD caller-name transmission or display was in force on 2026-09-24; the latest primary material read is a proposal. inferred in context

Cite this source record

APA

WarmTransfer. (2025, October 7). FCC Fact Sheet and draft: Call Branding FNPRM, Improving Verification and Presentation of Caller Identification Information (FCC-CIRC2510-07). WarmTransfer. https://warmtransfer.net/knowledge/sources/fcc-doc-415059-call-branding-draft

BibTeX

@misc{warmtransfer-fcc-doc-415059-call-branding-draft,
  title  = {FCC Fact Sheet and draft: Call Branding FNPRM, Improving Verification and Presentation of Caller Identification Information (FCC-CIRC2510-07)},
  author = {{WarmTransfer}},
  year   = {2025},
  url    = {https://warmtransfer.net/knowledge/sources/fcc-doc-415059-call-branding-draft},
  note   = {Federal Communications Commission, accessed 2026-09-24}
}