Source note · Outbound callback and dialer compliance
In McLaughlin Chiropractic v. McKesson (June 20, 2025) the Supreme Court held that in enforcement proceedings district courts are not bound by the FCC's interpretation of the TCPA and must decide the statute's meaning themselves.
Checked 2026-09-25
- Vendor
- US Supreme Court
- Product
- TCPA judicial interpretation
- Subsystem
- legal interpretation
- Deployment
- any
- Region
- us
- Release range
- decided 2025-06-20
- Checked
- 2026-09-25
Sources
- McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp., No. 23-1226 — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School (US Supreme Court opinion) · tier 1 standards and regulators · syllabus
Cite this note
APA
WarmTransfer. (2026, September 25). Outbound callback and dialer compliance: source note contact-center-callback-compliance-mclaughlin-not-bound. WarmTransfer. https://warmtransfer.net/knowledge/claims/contact-center-callback-compliance-mclaughlin-not-bound
BibTeX
@misc{warmtransfer-claim-contact-center-callback-compliance-mclaughlin-not-bound,
title = {Outbound callback and dialer compliance: source note contact-center-callback-compliance-mclaughlin-not-bound},
author = {{WarmTransfer}},
year = {2026},
url = {https://warmtransfer.net/knowledge/claims/contact-center-callback-compliance-mclaughlin-not-bound},
note = {Source note contact-center-callback-compliance-mclaughlin-not-bound, checked 2026-09-25}
}