Source note · Call blocking and analytics labeling remediation
In FCC 25-15 the Commission declined to require display of caller name information when a provider displays an indication that caller ID was authenticated, and urged industry to keep developing Rich Call Data and branded calling.
Checked 2026-09-24
The Commission declines to require the display of caller name information when a provider chooses to display an indication that caller ID has been authenticated.
- Vendor
- FCC
- Product
- FCC 25-15
- Subsystem
- caller-identity-display
- Deployment
- pstn
- Region
- us
- Release range
- FCC 25-15
- Checked
- 2026-09-24
Sources
- Advanced Methods To Target and Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls (final rule; FCC 25-15), 90 FR 13416 — Office of the Federal Register / Federal Communications Commission · tier 1 standards and regulators · Synopsis para. 19, 'Status of Rich Call Data or Other Caller Name Tools'
Cite this note
APA
WarmTransfer. (2026, September 24). Call blocking and analytics labeling remediation: source note call-blocking-labeling-no-caller-name-mandate. WarmTransfer. https://warmtransfer.net/knowledge/claims/call-blocking-labeling-no-caller-name-mandate
BibTeX
@misc{warmtransfer-claim-call-blocking-labeling-no-caller-name-mandate,
title = {Call blocking and analytics labeling remediation: source note call-blocking-labeling-no-caller-name-mandate},
author = {{WarmTransfer}},
year = {2026},
url = {https://warmtransfer.net/knowledge/claims/call-blocking-labeling-no-caller-name-mandate},
note = {Source note call-blocking-labeling-no-caller-name-mandate, checked 2026-09-24}
}