Source record · tier 1 standards and regulators
RFC 8217 — Clarifications for When to Use the name-addr Production in SIP Messages
- Publisher
- IETF / RFC Editor
- URL
- https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8217.html
- Published
- 2017-08
- Updated
- unknown
- Accessed
- 2026-09-16
- HTTP status
- 200
- License
- IETF Trust / BCP 78; permitted with the RFC's own copyright and license notices intact
Source notes citing this source
- An attended transfer's Refer-To carries an escaped Replaces, which contains both a question mark separating the header from the URI and semicolons separating the dialog tags, so under RFC 8217 that Refer-To must be written in the name-addr form with angle brackets rather than as a bare address. inferred in context
- RFC 8217 updates RFC 3515 and RFC 3892 to require that where a SIP header field grammar allows a choice between the name-addr and addr-spec forms, the addr-spec form must not be used if its value would contain a comma, a semicolon or a question mark, and that any URI parameters are contained within angle brackets. in context
Cite this source record
APA
WarmTransfer. (n.d.). RFC 8217 — Clarifications for When to Use the name-addr Production in SIP Messages. WarmTransfer. https://warmtransfer.net/knowledge/sources/rfc-8217-name-addr
BibTeX
@misc{warmtransfer-rfc-8217-name-addr,
title = {RFC 8217 — Clarifications for When to Use the name-addr Production in SIP Messages},
author = {{WarmTransfer}},
year = {2017},
url = {https://warmtransfer.net/knowledge/sources/rfc-8217-name-addr},
note = {IETF / RFC Editor, accessed 2026-09-16}
}