Proxy servers require no new behaviour to support Replaces and simply pass the header field transparently, and RFC 3891 notes that a proxy forking on application logic such as caller screening or time-of-day routing can forward a Replaces INVITE to a completely different set of contacts from the request it was meant to replace, in which case the request fails.

Checked 2026-09-16

Vendor
IETF
Product
Session Initiation Protocol
Subsystem
Replaces
Deployment
not restricted
Region
not restricted
Release range
Standards Track
Checked
2026-09-16

Sources

Cite this note

APA

WarmTransfer. (2026, September 16). Call transfer semantics REFER and Replaces: source note xfersem-replaces-proxies-can-break-it. WarmTransfer. https://warmtransfer.net/knowledge/claims/xfersem-replaces-proxies-can-break-it

BibTeX

@misc{warmtransfer-claim-xfersem-replaces-proxies-can-break-it,
  title  = {Call transfer semantics REFER and Replaces: source note xfersem-replaces-proxies-can-break-it},
  author = {{WarmTransfer}},
  year   = {2026},
  url    = {https://warmtransfer.net/knowledge/claims/xfersem-replaces-proxies-can-break-it},
  note   = {Source note xfersem-replaces-proxies-can-break-it, checked 2026-09-16}
}

Read in context